Análisis · Estrategia · EuropaGranada, España
Critical MeridianPolítica, seguridad y relaciones internacionales

Fuentes y lecturas

Bibliografía por análisis

Consulta las referencias citadas en cada texto y vuelve al análisis para leerlas en su contexto.

Cuando Europa vota, ¿a quién castiga? El voto de castigo en las elecciones europeas (1979-2024)

Política Europea · 16 referencias

  1. Bosch, A. (2024). Second-order economic voting in elections to the European Parliament. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 109(2), e3159. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.3159
  2. Braun, D., y Popa, S. A. (2018). This time it was different? The salience of the Spitzenkandidaten system among European parties. West European Politics, 41(5), 1125-1145.
  3. De Sio, L., Franklin, M. N., y Russo, L. (Eds.). (2019). The European Parliament elections of 2019. Luiss University Press.
  4. De Vreese, C. H. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Aksant Academic Publishers.
  5. Ferrara, F., y Weishaupt, J. T. (2004). Get your act together: Party performance in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, 5(3), 283-306.
  6. Franklin, M. N., y Hobolt, S. B. (2011). The legacy of lethargy: How elections to the European Parliament depress turnout. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 67-76.
  7. Hix, S., y Høyland, B. (2011). The political system of the European Union (3.ª ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Hix, S., y Marsh, M. (2007). Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 495-510.
  9. Hobolt, S. B. (2015). The 2014 European Parliament elections: Divided in unity? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(S1), 6-21.
  10. Hobolt, S. B., y Spoon, J.-J. (2012). Motivating the European voter: Parties, issues and campaigns in European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 51(6), 701-727.
  11. Hobolt, S. B., y Wittrock, J. (2011). The second-order election model revisited: An experimental test of vote choices in European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 29-40.
  12. Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 591-607.
  13. Reif, K., y Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3-44.
  14. Schmitt, H. (2005). The European Parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order? West European Politics, 28(3), 650-679.
  15. Schuck, A. R. T., Xezonakis, G., Elenbaas, M., Banducci, S. A., y de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: The 2009 European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 41-52.
  16. Van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M., y Marsh, M. (1996). What voters teach us about Europe-wide elections: What Europe-wide elections teach us about voters. Electoral Studies, 15(2), 149-166.

¿Por qué invadió Rusia Ucrania? Dos lecturas geopolíticas de una guerra

Estudios de la Guerra · 10 referencias

  1. Allison, R. (2014). Russian «deniable» intervention in Ukraine: How and why Russia broke the rules. International Affairs, 90(6), 1255-1297.
  2. Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Basic Books.
  3. Kennan, G. F. (1997, 5 de febrero). A fateful error. The New York Times.
  4. Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421-437.
  5. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West's fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77-89.
  6. Ó Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Ó Tuathail, G., y Agnew, J. (1992). Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography, 11(2), 190-204.
  8. Plokhy, S. (2015). The gates of Europe: A history of Ukraine. Basic Books.
  9. Sakwa, R. (2015). Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the borderlands. I.B. Tauris.
  10. Toal, G. (2017). Near abroad: Putin, the West and the contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford University Press.

La máquina decide, ¿quién responde? Tecnología, guerra convencional y responsabilidad moral

Seguridad y Defensa · 12 referencias

  1. Clausewitz, C. von. (1832). Vom Kriege. Ferdinand Dümmler.
  2. Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja. (2021). Posición del CICR sobre los sistemas de armas autónomos. CICR.
  3. Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford University Press.
  4. Gray, C. S. (1999). Modern strategy. Oxford University Press.
  5. Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
  6. Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (3.ª ed.). Polity Press.
  7. Keegan, J. (1994). A history of warfare. Vintage Books.
  8. Krepinevich, A. F. (1994). Cavalry to computer: The pattern of military revolutions. The National Interest, (37), 30-42.
  9. Rid, T. (2013). Cyber war will not take place. Hurst.
  10. Scharre, P. (2018). Army of none: Autonomous weapons and the future of war. W. W. Norton.
  11. Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the twenty-first century. Penguin Press.
  12. Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.

China se acerca, Estados Unidos no se va. Treinta años de rivalidad medidos con el Índice Elcano

Geopolítica · 9 referencias

  1. Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides's trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  2. Farrell, H., y Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79.
  3. Gracia Santos, M., y Olivié, I. (2021a). 1990-2020. Del mundo bipolar a la globalización regionalizada. Real Instituto Elcano.
  4. Gracia Santos, M., y Olivié, I. (2021b). El fin del mundo pre-COVID: ¿qué nos dicen los resultados del Índice Elcano de Presencia Global para 2020? Real Instituto Elcano.
  5. Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton University Press.
  6. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.
  7. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
  8. Olivié, I., y Gracia Santos, M. (2022). Informe Elcano de Presencia Global 2022. Real Instituto Elcano.
  9. Olivié, I., y Gracia Santos, M. (2023). (Re)globalización tras la pandemia. Análisis de los resultados del Índice Elcano de Presencia Global 2022. Real Instituto Elcano.

La Corona en portada. Cómo encuadra la prensa española a la monarquía (2017-2023)

Comunicación Política · 6 referencias

  1. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
  2. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
  3. Hallin, D. C., y Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
  4. McCombs, M. E., y Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
  5. Semetko, H. A., y Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.
  6. Corpus de análisis: 300 noticias publicadas en La Razón, ABC, El Mundo, El País, Público y elDiario.es en 2016-2017 y 2022-2023. Base de datos y libro de códigos de elaboración propia.